Archive for the ‘Machine Learning’ Category

Accurate NCAA Picks

April 6, 2008

But three engineering professors at the Georgia Institute of Technology have created a computer ranking system, called LRMC, that consistently predicts NCAA basketball rankings more accurately than the AP poll of sportswriters and the ESPN/USA Today poll of coaches, formulas (the Ratings Percentage Index), other computer models (the Massey ratings and the Sagarin ratings), and even the tournament seeds themselves.

After correctly picking all four of this year’s finalists, the LRMC method has now identified 30 of the last 36 Final Four participants (83 percent accuracy over the past nine years of NCAA tournaments) as one of the top two teams in their region. Over the same nine-year stretch, the seedings and polls have correctly identified only 23, and the RPI indentified 21.

LRMC (Logistic Regression Markov Chain) is a college basketball rankings system designed to use only basic scoreboard data, including which teams played, which team had home court advantage and the margin of victory. It was originally designed by Joel Sokol and Paul Kvam and has been maintained and improved by Sokol and George Nemhauser, all three optimization and statistics professors in the Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech.

GeorgiaTech News

Their Rankings:
http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/people/faculty/Joel_Sokol/lrmc/lrmc.sort0.html

Performance Comparison:
http://www2.isye.gatech.edu/people/faculty/Joel_Sokol/lrmc/lrmccomparison.pdf

Finally, refer the paper describing LRMC model.

NIPS paper evaluation criteria

May 22, 2006

Rexa via Hunch

April 29, 2006

Bumped into two interesting sites while googling on model selection, power normal distribution, etc.

  1. Rexa – Computer Science research index – intelligent than citeseer,etc
  2. Hunch is an interesting blog on Machine Learning Theory

Model Selection and Differential Geometry

April 21, 2006

Vinh and I presented a paper by Myung, Vijay, et.al on how the geometry of parameter manifolds of PDFs can be used to arrive at a model selection criterion. More over, they show the relation between Bayesian Information Criterion and Minimum Description Length with interesting geometric intuitions.